Two specialists that help research teams stay on course.
Built for a life-sciences research consultancy, Apollo brings two AI agents into the team’s own workspace. One supports project management. The other, an epidemiologist, supports study methods. Both prepare work for the scientists who make the decisions.
Project manager
Keeps plans, timelines and decisions organised and visible.
Epidemiologist
Drafts study methods and reviews them for sources of bias.
Engagements kept organised, from kick-off to delivery
Apollo’s project manager sets up each project the way the firm works, watches for anything falling behind, and tells the person who owns it.
Set-up
Design
Execution
Delivery
- What has happened
- The analysis plan is a week behind the agreed timeline.
- Why it matters
- Two later tasks depend on it.
- What I have done
- Updated the timeline and noted the dependency.
- What I need
- A decision on whether to move the delivery date.
Study methods, drafted and then reviewed
Apollo’s epidemiologist prepares methods work on the firm’s templates. A separate review step then examines the draft before a senior scientist takes it forward.
- Eligibility criteriaDrafted
- Treatment strategiesDrafted
- Assignment procedureDrafted
- Start of follow-upOpen: more detail needed
- OutcomesDrafted
- Causal contrastDrafted
- Analysis planOpen: more detail needed
- Timing of follow-up Clear
- Selection of participants Clear
- Loss to follow-up Flag
- Outcome measurement Clear
- Reporting checklist Clear
Where a brief does not give enough to go on, Apollo says so and leaves the item open. An honest gap is more useful to a scientist than a confident guess.
A way of working your team can see and shape
Each agent follows a process the team can open, read and edit. When the firm refines how it works, the agents follow, and every change is kept in a version history.
The agents prepare. The scientists decide.
Apollo takes care of
- Project boards, timelines and meeting notes
- Checks against the firm’s own standards
- Study specifications and protocol drafts
- A structured review, with a written result
The team looks after
- Every word that goes to a client
- Scientific interpretation and sign-off
- Decisions the agents bring forward
- Teaching the agents how the firm works
Rules that keep the scientists in charge
People speak to clients
The agents draft, check and flag. Anything that leaves the firm is reviewed and sent by a person.
Read-only where it should be
The agents read the firm’s boards and channels to stay informed. They cannot change them.
No identifiable data
Methods work uses aggregated, de-identified or synthetic data only.
A reviewer for every draft
The step that writes a draft is never the step that approves it.
Apollo is deployed in your organisation’s own cloud and follows your own standards, templates and project boards.
Tell us how a new engagement starts at your firm.
Bring your project template and a recent study design. We will show you which parts Apollo drafts and which stay with your scientists.
- You walk us through the process and the system behind it.
- We tell you plainly whether an agent is the right fix.
- If it is, we outline what we would build and what it would take from your team.